otakuno.video
Otaku, No Video









Search Preview

Otaku, No Video

otakuno.video
Main Page From Otaku, No Video Jump to: navigation, search Welcome to the
.video > otakuno.video

SEO audit: Content analysis

Language Error! No language localisation is found.
Title Otaku, No Video
Text / HTML ratio 41 %
Frame Excellent! The website does not use iFrame solutions.
Flash Excellent! The website does not have any flash contents.
Keywords cloud page Review anime work information Reviews manga wiki shot start Anime add works describe describing Page titled Manga Otaku Video
Keywords consistency
Keyword Content Title Description Headings
page 11
Review 9
anime 9
work 8
information 4
Reviews 4
Headings
H1 H2 H3 H4 H5 H6
1 2 15 0 0 0
Images We found 3 images on this web page.

SEO Keywords (Single)

Keyword Occurrence Density
page 11 0.55 %
Review 9 0.45 %
anime 9 0.45 %
work 8 0.40 %
information 4 0.20 %
Reviews 4 0.20 %
manga 4 0.20 %
wiki 4 0.20 %
shot 4 0.20 %
start 4 0.20 %
Anime 3 0.15 %
add 3 0.15 %
works 3 0.15 %
describe 3 0.15 %
describing 3 0.15 %
Page 3 0.15 %
titled 3 0.15 %
Manga 3 0.15 %
Otaku 3 0.15 %
Video 3 0.15 %

SEO Keywords (Two Word)

Keyword Occurrence Density
the work 6 0.30 %
of the 5 0.25 %
to the 4 0.20 %
Reviews should 3 0.15 %
to start 3 0.15 %
page for 3 0.15 %
other works 3 0.15 %
Manga Review 3 0.15 %
as an 3 0.15 %
No Video 3 0.15 %
Otaku No 3 0.15 %
describing the 3 0.15 %
using the 2 0.10 %
an anime 2 0.10 %
a list 2 0.10 %
list of 2 0.10 %
This page 2 0.10 %
work to 2 0.10 %
and add 2 0.10 %
to other 2 0.10 %

SEO Keywords (Three Word)

Keyword Occurrence Density Possible Spam
Otaku No Video 3 0.15 % No
Where to start 2 0.10 % No
an early scene 2 0.10 % No
page for a 2 0.10 % No
to other works 2 0.10 % No
is this place? 2 0.10 % No
What is this 2 0.10 % No
other works such 2 0.10 % No
of the work 2 0.10 % No
the work to 2 0.10 % No
as an early 2 0.10 % No
early scene in 2 0.10 % No
Other Methods of 2 0.10 % No
a list of 2 0.10 % No
How to help 2 0.10 % No
Neon Genesis Evangelion 2 0.10 % No
titled Manga Review 2 0.10 % No
Reviews should avoid 2 0.10 % No
Methods of Discussion 2 0.10 % No
the show's theme 1 0.05 % No

SEO Keywords (Four Word)

Keyword Occurrence Density Possible Spam
Other Methods of Discussion 2 0.10 % No
an early scene in 2 0.10 % No
as an early scene 2 0.10 % No
What is this place? 2 0.10 % No
to other works such 2 0.10 % No
Music appropriateness to the 1 0.05 % No
from one shot to 1 0.05 % No
one shot to the 1 0.05 % No
shot to the next 1 0.05 % No
to the next Music 1 0.05 % No
the next Music appropriateness 1 0.05 % No
next Music appropriateness to 1 0.05 % No
the show's theme whether 1 0.05 % No
appropriateness to the show's 1 0.05 % No
to the show's theme 1 0.05 % No
shot length from one 1 0.05 % No
show's theme whether it's 1 0.05 % No
theme whether it's too 1 0.05 % No
whether it's too strong 1 0.05 % No
it's too strong or 1 0.05 % No

Otakuno.video Spined HTML

Otaku, No Video Main Page From Otaku, No Video Jump to: navigation, search Welcome to the Otaku, No Video wiki! Contents 1 What is this place? 2 Other Methods of Discussion 3 Where to start 4 Article Format 5 Writing Philosophy 6 How to help What is this place?[edit] This started as an anime blog, which Brent has turned into a wiki. Eventually, this site will be a repository for intelligent, crowdsourced reviews and wringer of anime and manga. Reviews will be synthesized from multiple viewpoints. Anyone can start a page for a given anime or manga series, and add their review. Others will then come withal and add to that page, correcting mistakes and tent increasingly points. In addition, Brent posts his Panel Slides here. Other Methods of Discussion[edit] Live stream every Friday night starting at 8:00pm Eastern Time on Twitch Discord server Podcast Where to start[edit] See the Videos to add page for a list of Brent's YouTube videos that aren't on this wiki yet. Category:Review Category:Anime Review Category:Manga Review Category:Book Review Read the User's Guide for information on using the wiki software. Article Format[edit]Waresare now stuff converted into the pursuit standard format: ImageVitalinformation well-nigh the work: Year released, director (for anime), throne writer, versifier (for manga), anime studio (for anime), availability, etc. A person's name should link to his or her entry in Anime News Network's Encyclopedia. Review. This should unchangingly be spoiler-free. If a work has multiple adaptations, its reviews are listed separately as "Manga Review", "Anime Review", etc. Similarly, if the reviewer has only read the first volume of several volumes, the section should be titled "Manga Review (Volume 1)". Analysis. This contains spoilers, and should use the spoiler_warning.png image. This section should describe major themes of the work (such as religion, honor, or love) and references within the work to other works (such as an early scene in De:vadasy that copies the same events as an early scene in Neon Genesis Evangelion), and compare it to other works (such comparing the Dolems of Rahxephon to the Evangelions of Neon Genesis Evangelion). Writing Philosophy[edit] The wares here should focus on describing the work rather than describing the reviewer's reaction.Staveusing the word "I." Reviews should stave positive/negative adjectives like "awful" or "amazing." Reviews should stave describing the plot other than remarkable events that rationalization the work to stand out from other works in the same genres. Prefer to describe a work's vital premise and genres in a sentence or two. Reviews should describe the elements of the work, including (but not limited to): Animation (naturalism; stylization; verisimilitude palette; number of unique drawings; fluidity; realism)Weftinteraction (believability of weft reactions) Realism (recognizing that the staff may not have aimed for realism) Direction (framing of the notation in each shot; overall pacing; style of action) Editing (shot length; variation of shot length from one shot to the next) Music (appropriateness to the show's theme; whether it's too strong or too weak for the emotion of the scenes) Voice vicarial (prefer to highlight constructive voice vicarial rather than mutter well-nigh vicarial you don't like) Feel self-ruling to start a review that only touches on a few of these elements. Other writers can tinkle in with other elements. How to help[edit] The Category:Stub category lists pages that have very little information, and could use expansion. Every work should have its own page, not individual adaptations. So, there should be only one page for Akira, plane though there's both a manga and an anime version. That page should have one section titled "Manga Review" and flipside titled "Anime Review". All of the image URLs need to be reverted from http://www.otakunovideo.net/wp-content/uploads/... to http://www.otakuno.video/uploaded_images/... At some point, it'd be tomfool to have a page explaining how anime is made. For now, here's a list of anime job titles. Retrieved from "https://otakuno.video/w/index.php?title=Main_Page&oldid=2014" Navigation menu Personal tools Create accountLog in Namespaces Page Discussion Variants Views Read Edit View history Actions Search Navigation Main page Recent changes Random page Help Tools What links here Related changes Special pages Printable version Permanent link Page information This page was last modified on 9 September 2017, at 08:19. This page has been accessed 110,374 times. Content is misogynist under Creative Commons Attribution Share Alike unless otherwise noted. Privacy policyWell-nighOtaku, No Video Disclaimers